Insights · Grant finance
First Federal Grant for a Nonprofit: The Finance Requirements That Follow the Award
A nonprofit's first federal grant brings rules its books may not be built for yet: written procedures, internal controls, time and effort records, budget approvals, SF-425 reporting, and possibly a Single Audit. Here is the list, with citations.
The short version
- A nonprofit's first federal grant brings it under 2 CFR Part 200 (the Uniform Guidance). Most finance rules sit in Subparts D and E.
- The financial management system must identify each award, compare spending with budget, and be backed by written procedures for cash management and cost allowability (2 CFR 200.302(b)).
- Internal control over the award must be established and documented, aligned with the GAO Green Book or COSO (2 CFR 200.303).
- Payroll charged to the award must rest on records of work actually performed; budget estimates alone do not qualify (2 CFR 200.430(g)).
- Procurement needs documented procedures, a written conflict of interest policy, and records for each purchase (2 CFR 200.318 to 200.320).
- Financial reports (SF-425) are due 30 days after quarterly or semiannual periods and 90 days after annual ones (2 CFR 200.328). A Single Audit applies once federal expenditures reach $1,000,000 in a fiscal year beginning on or after October 1, 2024 (2 CFR 200.501).
Before the award: SAM.gov, the UEI, and the risk review
A first federal grant starts with registration. Under 2 CFR 25.200, an applicant must be registered in SAM.gov before it applies, include its Unique Entity ID (UEI) in each application, and keep an active registration at all times while it holds an active award or has an application under consideration. It must review and update its SAM.gov information annually. SAM.gov states that a registration must be renewed every 365 days to stay active.
Grants.gov notes that registration is free and can take up to 10 business days to become active, or weeks or months if information cannot be verified.
Before making the award, the agency reviews risk under 2 CFR 200.206. It considers financial stability, the quality of management systems, history of performance on prior federal awards (if applicable), and audit reports and findings (if applicable). Where the agency sees risk, it may add specific conditions under 2 CFR 200.208. Our reading: a first-time grantee has no federal track record to point to, so its systems carry more of the weight in that review, and any specific conditions in the award letter deserve a close read.
Financial management standards (2 CFR 200.302)
Under 2 CFR 200.302(b), the financial management system must provide for:
- Identification of every federal award received and expended, including the Assistance Listings title and number, the Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN), the year issued, and the federal agency or pass-through entity.
- Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of each award's financial results, as the reporting rules in 200.328 and 200.329 require.
- Records that identify the amount, source, and expenditure of federal funds, supported by source documentation.
- Effective control over and accountability for all funds, property, and assets.
- Comparison of expenditures with budget amounts for each federal award.
- Written procedures to implement the payment rules in 200.305.
- Written procedures for determining the allowability of costs under Subpart E and the award terms.
Items 6 and 7 are explicit: the procedures must be written. An organization that does not keep its books on an accrual basis is not required to build an accrual system when an agency asks for accrual reporting; it may develop accrual data from the documentation on hand (200.302(b)(2)).
Internal controls (2 CFR 200.303)
The recipient must establish, document, and maintain effective internal control over the award that provides reasonable assurance of compliance. The controls should align with the Comptroller General's "Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government" (the Green Book) or the COSO "Internal Control-Integrated Framework." The recipient must also monitor its compliance, act promptly on noncompliance, and take reasonable cybersecurity measures to protect personally identifiable and other sensitive information.
Written procedures a first federal grant requires
| Area | What the rule requires | Citation |
|---|---|---|
| Cash management | Written procedures that minimize the time between receiving federal funds and disbursing them, as a condition of advance payment | 200.302(b)(6), 200.305(b)(1) |
| Allowability | Written procedures for deciding whether a cost is allowable | 200.302(b)(7) |
| Procurement | Documented procurement procedures, consistent with 200.317 to 200.327 | 200.318(a) |
| Conflicts of interest | Written standards of conduct for employees involved in selecting, awarding, and administering contracts, with disciplinary actions for violations | 200.318(c)(1) |
| Compensation | Total compensation that conforms to an established written policy applied consistently to federal and non-federal work | 200.430(a)(1) |
| Leave | Paid leave charged as a fringe benefit provided under established written leave policies | 200.431(b)(1) |
| Travel | Travel costs consistent with established written policies; without one, federal travel rates apply | 200.475(a), (d) |
Cash management and payments (2 CFR 200.305)
Advance payment depends on those written procedures and on systems that meet the fund control standards; advances must be limited to immediate cash needs. Under reimbursement, the agency must pay within 30 calendar days of a proper request. Separate bank accounts cannot be required, but all federal funds must be accounted for. Advances belong in interest-bearing accounts unless an exception applies, such as less than $250,000 in federal funding per year; interest above $500 a year is returned to the HHS Payment Management System.
Allowability (2 CFR 200.403)
An allowable cost must be necessary, reasonable, and allocable; within the limits of the cost principles and the award; consistent with policies applied uniformly to federal and other work; treated consistently as direct or indirect; determined under GAAP; not counted toward another federal award's cost share; and adequately documented.
Procurement (2 CFR 200.318 to 200.320)
Procurement must provide full and open competition (200.319). Under 200.320, micro-purchases need no competitive quotes if the price is documented as reasonable, and a recipient may self-certify a micro-purchase threshold up to $50,000 annually with documentation. Larger purchases up to the simplified acquisition threshold need quotes from an adequate number of qualified sources; above it, formal methods with public notice apply. For each procurement, records must show the rationale for the method, contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the price (200.318(i)).
Time and effort documentation (2 CFR 200.430(g))
Salaries charged to a federal award must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. They must be supported by internal control, reflect the employee's total compensated activity, and support the salary split when someone works on more than one award or on federal and non-federal work. Budget estimates alone do not qualify as support. They may be used for interim accounting only if the system produces reasonable approximations, significant changes are entered promptly, and periodic after-the-fact reviews adjust the charges so the final amount is accurate. For nonexempt employees, records must also show total hours worked each day (200.430(g)(3)).
Budget estimates alone do not support payroll charged to a federal award. Records must reflect the work actually performed.
Budget revisions and prior approvals (2 CFR 200.308)
The recipient must report deviations from the approved budget or scope and request prior written approval for listed changes, including:
- A change in scope or objective.
- A change in key personnel named in the award.
- Absence of the approved project director for more than three months, or a 25 percent reduction in their time on the award.
- Transfer of participant support costs to other categories.
- Subawards not in the approved application.
- A change in approved cost sharing, or a need for additional federal funds.
An agency may also restrict transfers among direct cost categories when the federal share exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold and cumulative transfers exceed 10 percent of the approved budget (200.308(i)). No-cost extension requests should go in at least 10 calendar days before the period of performance ends.
Reporting: the SF-425 and performance reports
Under 2 CFR 200.328, the financial report is the SF-425 Federal Financial Report. Reports are collected at least annually and, unless a specific condition applies, no more than quarterly. Quarterly and semiannual reports are due 30 calendar days after the period, annual reports 90 days, and the final report 120 days after the period of performance ends (90 days for a subrecipient). Performance reports under 200.329 follow the same clock. Our federal grant reporting requirements calendar walks through the dates.
If the grantee passes funds through (2 CFR 200.332)
A first-time grantee that makes subawards becomes a pass-through entity. It must confirm in SAM.gov that a subrecipient is not excluded, include the required federal award information in each subaward, evaluate each subrecipient's fraud and noncompliance risk, monitor activity and review financial and performance reports, follow up on audit findings related to the subaward, and verify that subrecipients are audited as required.
Audit and records retention
A nonprofit that expends $1,000,000 or more in federal awards in its fiscal year must have a Single Audit, or in limited cases a program-specific audit (2 CFR 200.501). The Federal Audit Clearinghouse applies $1,000,000 to fiscal years starting on or after October 1, 2024, and $750,000 to earlier years. The package is due the earlier of 30 days after the auditor's report or nine months after year end (2 CFR 200.512). Our Single Audit threshold guide and Single Audit checker cover the math.
Records are kept three years from the date the final financial report is submitted, longer if litigation, a claim, or an audit starts first or the agency extends the period in writing (2 CFR 200.334).
Interpretation: the finance gaps an outsourced firm can close
This section is our interpretation, not a rule. In our view, the gaps that follow a first federal grant tend to sit where an organization's existing practice meets a new written requirement:
- Policies that exist in practice but not on paper: cash management, allowability, procurement, conflicts of interest, compensation, leave, and travel.
- A chart of accounts or class structure that cannot report spending by award, or compare it with each award's budget.
- Payroll allocated by budget percentages, with no after-the-fact review against actual effort.
- Procurement files that do not show why a vendor was chosen or how the price was judged reasonable.
- No monthly reconciliation of drawdowns to the ledger, and no tracking of interest on advances.
- No register of award terms, prior approval triggers, and report due dates.
- No forecast of federal expenditures against the Single Audit threshold.
Each maps to a deliverable: a policy set, a restructured ledger, a time and effort process, procurement file templates, a monthly close by award, and an audit readiness plan.
How to spot a first-time federal grantee
USAspending.gov publishes prime award records with the recipient name as registered in SAM.gov and the recipient's UEI. A practical check (our method, not an official definition):
- Search grants for the organization and sort its awards by start date. If the earliest grant is recent, it may be a first award.
- Check subawards too. An organization may have received federal funds as a subrecipient before its first direct award.
- Watch for name variants. In our searches, one organization can appear under more than one recipient record, and older records may predate the UEI.
- Note the window. USAspending's award search currently starts at action dates of October 1, 2007.
Treat the result as Inferred until the organization confirms it. Our New Awards Watch and guide to federal award data show where these records come from.
How AwardNote uses this
Each AwardNote opportunity pairs a federal award trigger, such as a first direct award or a first Single Audit year, with a finance capacity signal, labels the evidence Verified, Inferred, or Unknown, and suggests who to approach and how to open the conversation. If you want to see that research applied to the nonprofits you serve, start with a $149 pilot: 14 days, 5 researched opportunities, no auto-renewal.
Sources
All retrieved October 29, 2026.
- 2 CFR 200.1, Definitions (eCFR): ecfr.gov
- 2 CFR 200.206, Federal agency review of risk posed by applicants (eCFR): ecfr.gov
- 2 CFR 200.302, Financial management (eCFR): ecfr.gov
- 2 CFR 200.303, Internal controls (eCFR): ecfr.gov
- 2 CFR 200.305, Federal payment (eCFR): ecfr.gov
- 2 CFR 200.308, Revision of budget and program plans (eCFR): ecfr.gov
- 2 CFR 200.318 to 200.320, Procurement standards (eCFR): ecfr.gov
- 2 CFR 200.328 and 200.329, Financial and performance reporting (eCFR): ecfr.gov
- 2 CFR 200.332, Requirements for pass-through entities (eCFR): ecfr.gov
- 2 CFR 200.334, Record retention requirements (eCFR): ecfr.gov
- 2 CFR 200.403, Factors affecting allowability of costs (eCFR): ecfr.gov
- 2 CFR 200.430 and 200.431, Compensation (eCFR): ecfr.gov
- 2 CFR 200.475, Travel costs (eCFR): ecfr.gov
- 2 CFR 200.501 and 200.512, Audit requirements and report submission (eCFR): ecfr.gov
- 2 CFR 25.200, SAM.gov registration requirements (eCFR): ecfr.gov
- SAM.gov, Entity Registration: sam.gov
- Grants.gov, Applicant Registration: grants.gov
- Federal Audit Clearinghouse, eligibility and thresholds: fac.gov
- USAspending API, glossary (Recipient Name, UEI, Sub-Recipient, Action Date): usaspending.gov
- USAspending API, award search endpoint (time period note): usaspending.gov
FAQ
What does a nonprofit need after receiving its first federal grant?
An active SAM.gov registration, a financial management system that tracks each award and compares spending with budget, documented internal controls, written procedures for cash management, allowability, and procurement, payroll records based on actual work, and a calendar for SF-425 and performance reports (2 CFR 25.200 and 200.302 to 200.329).
Do time and effort records have to be timesheets?
The rule does not prescribe a form. Charges must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed and cover the employee's total activity. Budget estimates alone do not qualify, and nonexempt employees also need records of total hours worked each day (2 CFR 200.430(g)).
Does a first federal grant trigger a Single Audit?
Only if the nonprofit expends $1,000,000 or more in federal awards in a fiscal year beginning on or after October 1, 2024. Below that, it is exempt from federal audit requirements for that year, but its records must remain available for review (2 CFR 200.501).
Which budget changes need prior approval?
Changes in scope or objective, key personnel named in the award, cost sharing, or participant support costs, unapproved subawards, a need for more federal funds, and certain no-cost extensions, among others listed in 2 CFR 200.308(f).
How long does SAM.gov registration take for a new applicant?
Grants.gov advises allowing up to 10 business days for a SAM.gov registration to become active, and longer if information cannot be verified. Registration is free and must be renewed every year.


